|
[For the Dutch version, see the ABS Focal Point website.] Welcome to the eleventh ABS Focal Point newsletter. In this newsletter we update you on the most recent discussions on digital sequence information (DSI), explain what an IRCC is and delve deeper into when you are considered to be a user of genetic resources.
This newsletter contains:
|
|
Further discussions on Digital Sequence Information (DSI)
The issue of how to deal with access to and benefit-sharing from the use of digital sequence information (DSI) on genetic resources was further discussed during an international meeting in June 2022. Progress was made on the formulation of draft recommendations for a decision to be taken on DSI during the important COP-15 meeting, which has been postponed again and will now be held in Montreal, Canada, in December 2022.
Background
To assess the different policy options, a multi-criteria framework has been developed, with the criteria focusing on effectiveness, efficiency, good governance and coherence. A performance matrix was developed to assess to what extent the policy options fulfill these criteria. More information can be found in this CBD document, with its annex I presenting the policy options, its annex II the criteria and subcriteria to assess these options, and its annex III the performance matrix.
The Geneva meeting in March 2022
During the CBD meeting in Geneva in March 2022, it was agreed that an independent assessment would be made of the consequences of the various proposed policy options, using the formulated criteria and subcriteria. It was also agreed that the Informal Advisory Group on DSI would continue its work, with inclusion of representatives from databases, the scientific research community, the private sector and civil society organizations.
The Nairobi meeting in June 2022
During the additional meeting of the Open-Ended Working Group on the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (OEWG-4) held in Nairobi, Kenya, from 21-26 June 2022, the progress in the the Informal Advisory Group on DSI was presented and draft recommendations were discussed for a decision to be taken on DSI during the Fifteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the CBD (COP-15). The precise formulation of the recommendations, however, is still open for further discussion.
The recommendations refer to, among other things:
No detailed update was given on the independent assessment of the policy options that is currently being carried out.
Follow-up
It is expected that important decisions on DSI will be taken be taken during the Fifteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the CBD (COP-15). In Nairobi it was announced that COP-15 would be postponed again and will now be held in Montreal, Canada, from 7-19 December 2022. To prepare for COP-15, a short fifth meeting of the Open-ended Working Group on the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (OEWG-5) will be held in Montreal from 3-5 December.
What can you do?
As it is expected that important decisions will be taken be taken during COP-15 in December 2022, and the EU position to be taken in COP-15 will be discussed during the coming months, you are invited to make your views known to the Dutch ABS Competent National Authority (Ms Kim van Seeters; k.vanseeters@minlnv.nl). It would be very helpful if you could share your assessment of the policy options, especially by filling in the performance matrix. Thank you in advance for your contribution.
|
|
The internationally recognised certificate of compliance (IRCC) of the Nagoya ProtocolYou may have heard the terms ‘IRCC’ or ‘internationally recognised certificate of compliance’ in the context of ABS and the Nagoya Protocol. What are IRCCs and how do they make it easier for users to fulfil their due diligence obligations?
What is an IRCC?
What information does an IRCC contain?
According to Art.17 of the Nagoya Protocol, an IRCC shall at least contain the following information: the issuing authority; the date of issuance; the provider; a unique identifier of the certificate; the person or entity to whom PIC was granted; the subject-matter or genetic resources covered by the certificate; confirmation that PIC was obtained; confirmation that MAT were established; and whether it covers commercial and/or non-commercial use.
Additional information may be included, for instance on the conditions for third party transfer, as is specified in this IRCC. A published IRCC does not always provide all the elements mentioned above, for instance because some information is considered confidential. For example, this IRCC does not list the person or entity to whom PIC was granted. The ABSCH provides a list of all IRCC published by provider countries.
How can I use an IRCC? If this is not feasible, users need to document and provide information to show that they have applied due diligence. In this case, you need to go through the steps laid down in EU ABS Regulation (Regulation (EU) 511/2014), Article 4, paragraph 3, which specifies the information you need to collect to fulfil your obligations in this field. As it can take some effort to collect and keep this documentation, having an IRCC helps you to minimise your administrative burden.
IRCCs on the ABS Clearing-House |
|
Are you a user of genetic resources?If your activities with genetic resources fall under the definition of utilisation, you are considered to be a user. The EU ABS Regulation and EU Guidance document provide more information on what constitutes ‘utilisation of genetic resources’ within the European Union. In short, utilisation of genetic resources means: “to conduct research and/or development on the genetic and/or biochemical composition of genetic resources, including through the application of biotechnology.” This definition is used by the Nagoya Protocol and the EU ABS Regulation. If your activities with genetic resources fall under the definition of utilisation, you are considered to be a user. This is independent of the users’ size or of the intent of the use (commercial or non-commercial) and applies to individuals, including researchers, and to organisations such as universities or other research organisations, as well as to small and medium sized enterprises and multinational companies. Examples of activities that are considered to be utilisation under the EU ABS Regulation (NB The ‘Guidance sections’ indicated in the examples below refer to sections of the EU Guidance document that provide more information on the specific examples.)
Which activities are not considered utilisation? There are some activities, related to research and development, that are not considered utilisation under the EU ABS Regulation. The EU Guidance, specifically Annex II, elaborates on these activities. Below are a few examples of activities that are not considered to be utilisation in the sense of the EU ABS Regulation. However, if an activity mentioned below is combined with research on the specific genetic and/or biochemical composition of the genetic resource, specifically the function of the genes, the activity would qualify as utilisation. Examples of activities that are not considered to be utilisation under the EU ABS Regulation
Do note that some provider countries have established national access legislation for their genetic resources, with their own interpretation of ‘utilisation of genetic resources’, which may differ from the EU interpretation. This means that it is possible that activities which are not considered utilisation under the EU ABS Regulation are subject to national ABS rules of the provider country. Therefore it is recommended to contact the provider country’s National Focal Point (NFP) of the provider country to ask if any national ABS rules apply. The names and contact details of the NFPs of most countries are available on the ABS Clearing-House website. For a more extensive overview of activities which are considered utilisation or not, see ‘When am I a user under the EU ABS Regulation?’ in the FAQ section of the ABS Focal Point website, and section 2.3.3 and Annex II of the EU Guidance.
Read more |